Now that the New Zealand Royal Commission on COVID-19 has been released, I want to point out many of the things that ARE CLEARLY MISSING from the report.
The COVID-19 saga in New Zealand was like a chapter out of George Orwell’s 1984.
There are many reasons why it was so easy for the Labour government, under Jacinda Ardern, to hijack the entire country and destroy so much of society and our rights.
This article is just an overview of what I experienced first-hand as an investigator during that time. Each of these sections, in reality, could be AND SHOULD BE a full chapter or book on its own.
It is my hope that this little memoir of that experience is fuel for further, thorough investigations, PROSECUTIONS, and JAIL for all those in the New Zealand government and businesses who perpetrated these crimes.
We will NOT FORGET, and we will NOT FORGIVE.
—-
Sections:
-
How a Purposefully Placed Flaw in the Bill Of Rights Act (1990) Allowed Jacinda to Control New Zealand
-
NDAs: How to Silently Get Compliance
-
The PCR Swab Test CANNOT Test for Only ONE Virus
-
A Paid Media: The One Source of Truth
-
Be Kind, While We Take Your Rights: PR Companies Running the Govt
-
When is a Mortgage Holiday Not a Holiday?
-
The WAGE SUBSIDY: How to Kill Small Businesses
-
Suicides: What Was Reported vs What Was Happening
-
Mental Health Law Changes: Forced Mental Sectioning and Institutionalisation
-
“There was no compulsory vaccination!”: But Actions Said Otherwise
-
Mongrel Mob/Black Power: Paid Assassins for NZLabour
-
Forced Vaccinations in Low Decile Areas
-
New Zealand and Statistics
-
In Closing
-
Suggested Further Reading About New Zealand's Handling of COVID
--
How a Purposefully Placed Flaw in the Bill of Rights Act (1990) Allowed Jacinda to Control New Zealand and TAKE YOUR RIGHTS
People ask, “How was it possible that we were able to be locked down and lose so many rights during COVID?”
The framework for the lockdowns started in 1990 with the creation of the Bill of Rights Act (1990).
New Zealand does not have a single codified Constitution. It is an amalgam of several documents and unwritten sources. There is no real 'statement of being' for this country.
Likewise, New Zealand's Bill of Rights Act (1990) reads more like a crowd-control edict, written to enforce laws and statutes rather than to outline and document the actual rights themselves. The main reason is that New Zealand had never had a Bill of Rights up to that point. Much of the Bill of Rights Act (1990) was taken from the Canadian Bill of Rights.
The 1990 document itself was enacted as a consequence of New Zealand's signing the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and the UN's hand is clearly evident in its definition.
The New Zealand 'Constitution' and 'Bill of Rights' are separate documents from the governmental structure and laws, INSTEAD OF BEING THE FOUNDATION FOR THEM.
By their creation, both the Constitution Act (1986) and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act (1990) are statutes written well after the foundation of the governmental laws and structure, and they are subservient to them.
In fact, Section 4 of the Bill of Rights specifically denies the Act any supremacy over other legislation.
These few lines INVALIDATE the entire reason for having a Bill of Rights in the first place:
Other enactments not affected
No court shall, in relation to any enactment (whether passed or made before or after the commencement of this Bill of Rights),—
(a) hold any provision of the enactment to be impliedly repealed or revoked, or to be in any way invalid or ineffective;
or
(b) decline to apply any provision of the enactment— by reason only that the provision is inconsistent with any provision of this Bill of Rights.
In plain English:
No court can say that any part of any New Zealand law (old or new) is invalid, repealed, or should not be applied — even if that law CLEARLY breaches the Bill of Rights.
In other words: Parliament always wins. Even if a law seriously violates freedom of speech, freedom from unreasonable search, the right to a fair trial, or any other protected right — the courts have to go along with Parliament's choice and apply the law as written.
Parliamentary laws can, therefore, by definition, change the meaning of or alter the solidity of core Rights and Constitutional principals – an occurrence which should never be allowed to happen this easily.
As such, there is no Constitutional Law. Legislation written does not refer back to the Constitution or Bill of Rights [nor is it required to], which creates further problems once enacted.
These few lines are the government's "dirty little secret" and is why New Zealanders' rights can so quickly be diminished:
- Unfounded, lengthy country-wide lockdown (including arrests for breaking the lockdown rules) for COVID-19, which resulted in the near-total collapse of the economy.
- NZ Government voting themselves EXTREME POLICE POWERS: The COVID-19 Public Health Response Bill includes warrantless entry by Police, forced medical procedures for classes of people, mandatory ID checks, and more...
- The 'Right to Life' of babies taken away by the Abortion Legislation Bill, which was passed into law during the Level 4 lockdown, with no public consultation or referendum, allowing full-term abortions.
- The outright attack on religious rights by the COVID-19 Public Health (Alert Level 2) Order 2020, which limited the number of those gathering at a church to the same limit as you would find at a small cafe or restaurant, 10 people, regardless of the size of the venue or building. [The New Zealand Police blatantly disregarded this order and issued their own supplement that was based on the size of the building.]
Oh, by the way, STRIP CLUBS were exempt from those occupancy limits.
There is no Rule of Law
The Police must follow whatever whim their bosses tell them. Any officer or investigator who goes against the commands given to them may face severe consequences. Since there really aren't any whistleblower protections in the law, police have very few options in reporting misdeeds and corruption. [Police personnel are some of the most frustrated government employees I have met, as they are not allowed to really do their jobs and are forced to do things that are ethically and morally very, very, grey.]
- Former MP Hone Harawira's Northland Iwi COVID-19 checkpoint, the Taranaki Iwi beach checkpoint, and many other such checkpoints throughout the country were illegal vigilante activities, yet the Police ignored them and let them continue these actions for weeks. There were reports of harassment by these individuals towards people, and of locals being let through while others were not -- even under the lower Level 3 conditions. Some of the participants also wore gang colours and patches. The excuse that the Police were worried about reprisals and demonstrations by the Iwi is only further evidence of their previous failures, rooted in the erosion of trust. https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/121327600/iwi-checkpoints-might-be-polite-but-that-doesnt-make-them-legal
- "New Zealand Police’s decision to arrest Kiwis during alert level 4 despite being advised they had little legal basis to do so undermines the rule of law in New Zealand, the former Attorney-General believes." – Chris Finlayson, Newshub
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2020/05/coronavirus-troubling-arrests-during-lockdown-undermine-rule-of-law-in-new-zealand-former-attorney-general.html - After the lockdown and arrests were tacitly agreed to be illegal, the PM and Parliament went ahead and wrote another law, granting the Government unbelievable police powers. They also drastically curtailed citizens' ability to submit on the bill by limiting responses to those submitted within 1 day. https://thebfd.co.nz/2020/05/12/be-afraid-your-government-is-giving-itself-alarming-police-state-powers/
"The UN Human Rights Committee criticised New Zealand for the lack of court power to strike down legislation inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act 1990. They equated this lack of power with a lack of human rights protection."
– United Nations, 28 April 2016
Note:
I published the above Bill of Rights flaw in March 2020. It did not go unnoticed by the Labour Government. Several months later, the NZ Government released the "New Zealand Bill of Rights (Declarations of Inconsistency) Amendment Bill" which admits exactly what I wrote, that New Zealand Law and Government have no Checks and Balances, and that laws can and do violate the Bill of Rights Act.
Their solution, however, simply pawned off the ‘authentication’ to the Supreme Court [the same Supreme Court that willingly ALLOWED all of the Bill of Rights violations to happen in the first place].
The flaw in the Bill of Rights Act (1990) persists. It was never removed, and now the fox is guarding the hen house.
--
NDAs: How to Silently Get Compliance
A Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is a legally binding contract that establishes a confidential relationship between parties and restricts the disclosure of sensitive information, trade secrets, or intellectual property. It binds recipients not to disclose protected data and outlines the consequences of a breach.
During the COVID-19 scam in New Zealand, ALL Doctors, Nurses, Medical practitioners, GPs, lab technicians, hospital employees, etc., were forced to sign an NDA regarding COVID. This document may have come in many different formats, and many, if not most, were amended to the Employment Contract.
If any of these persons disclosed anything about COVID, they would lose their jobs.
In some cases (usually in hospitals), this fear of job loss spread verbally.
I was investigating which PCR primer New Zealand labs were using and at what cycle number the PCR machines were set.
I contacted a friend of mine who worked as a laboratory technician running PCR tests. He refused to speak about anything. I later confronted him at the church where he was an elder. He was terrified to see me. He shunned me, asked me to leave, and broke all contact with me.
THAT’S REAL FEAR. That is also a VERY EFFECTIVE way to prevent transparency.
What were they hiding?
In diagnostic PCR tests (such as those used to detect pathogens), the primers are carefully chosen to match unique sequences in the organism's genome (e.g., the SARS-CoV-2 spike gene), ensuring the test is specific and doesn't amplify irrelevant human or other DNA.
I wanted to know which manufacturer was supplying the primers because something did not add up.
Why cycles?
Running too many PCR cycles on a sample can increase the risk of false-positive results. The higher the cycles (amplification rate), the greater the error rate, which in turn yields a POSITIVE result.
The medical community in NZ is STILL in fear about disclosing what happened during COVID, for fear of being fired and ostracized in the community.
Here is the thing that NOBODY in New Zealand seems to understand:
An NDA CANNOT be used to cover up a crime or fraud. It renders the agreement null and void.
Example:
Someone CANNOT force you to sign an NDA about a murder.
Yet this is precisely what occurred.
--
The PCR Swab Test CANNOT Test for Only ONE Virus
The PCR is a technology for replicating DNA. It does not test for viruses.
It is a DNA copying machine.
This fact was reiterated many times by the inventor, Dr. Kary Mullis, who conveniently DIED four months before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic from pneumonia. [Read: murdered]
Some PCR Facts:
- The PCR test takes a sample, amplifies it (making millions of copies), and compares the result with a DNA primer to see if the Primer-Specific pathogen sequence is present in the amplified sample.
- Standard diagnostic PCR tests are primarily qualitative rather than quantitative. They cannot tell you how much loading of the pathogen you have, only that it exists.
(Do you have a LOT of the virus or only a tiny amount?) - The PCR cannot tell you if the pathogen is alive or dead.
- It doesn't tell you if the pathogen is actively causing disease, capable of transmission, or is just environmental or leftover material (like from a previous infection).
[This is a really good point in that if your body's immune system SUCCESSFULLY fought the pathogen and killed it, you will still, most likely show as POSITIVE.] - Remember, the PCR was designed to replicate DNA (make millions of copies of the test DNA). The number of CYCLES a PCR test is run quantifies the number of copies of genetic material, NOT necessarily live infectious particles (since dead cells contribute, too).
- The PCR test CANNOT differentiate between COVID-19, H1N1, or the FLU. That is because there are too many genetic similarities between a multitude of viruses and bacteria.
“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms …this test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
So, for a TOTALITARIAN government, the PCR is the PERFECT tool:
- Demand that people MUST take a PCR swab test to access benefits, employment, or events.
- Demand that you CANNOT fly overseas UNLESS you take the PCR swab test.
- Such a government could INSTANTLY lock down a city simply by INCREASING the CYCLE RATE (the number of PCR cycles run). A higher rate nearly always guarantees a POSITIVE.
Ta-Da! Lockdowns on demand!
[Some journals say that this CYCLE RATE to POSITIVE RATE connection is ‘false information’. HOWEVER, there is ample evidence to the contrary. Dr. Mullis even warned about it. Besides, who is PAYING for those journals? Always follow the money.]
Regarding the managed isolation and quarantine (MIQ) in hotels and military-style camps that people were forced to stay in after arriving by plane from another country:
If the PCR test worked, why was ISOLATION required?
If the vaccine worked, why was ISOLATION required?
Did keeping people INDOORS 24-hours a day with no fresh air or sunshine CONTRIBUTE to sickness?
Were the BREAK THE RULES and GO TO JAIL threats GOOD for health, or did they just increase STRESS?
People in MIQ were sending out photos of the so-called ‘meals’ they were receiving. Was the (lack of quality) food a factor in people’s sickness? Was it justified to PROSECUTE PEOPLE who texted about and sent images from MIQ to the outside world?
That was some Gestapo-level action.
Tens of Millions of dollars went to MIQ. Who was being paid? What were their connections to the NZ Labour Government? Why is there no transparency on this? Why has investigating for fraud been made UNLAWFUL?
Here is a FUN FACT:
I successfully predicted EVERY lockdown in New Zealand by 3 to 6 weeks.
How is that possible when a biological lockdown is supposed to be based on the CURRENT infection rate (per the WHO)?
My investigations and predictions were based on:
- Communications from the Ministry of Health, including communications to the Media.
- Communications to Chemists (Pharmacies).
- LOGISTICS (shipments) of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), disinfectant, and wipes to regional areas — which also includes the DIVERSION of such shipments.
- LOGISTICS (shipments) to Chemists (Pharmacies) of PPE, antibiotics, analgesics, and vaccines.
- Manpower allocations for: road cones, barriers, lights, and generators, and Police duty roster assignments.
- And mind-bogglingly stupid remarks from the Ministers themselves, like:
“Don’t forget to take your laptops home this weekend, the {region} will be locked down next week.”
NONE of the lockdowns in New Zealand were based on the current INFECTION RATES.
They were ALL PLANNED.
This is HIGH TREASON!
The definition of a pandemic is:
“a widespread occurrence of an infectious disease over a whole country or the world at a particular time.”
At no time was there a sickness in the whole country of New Zealand.
New Zealand is an island.
--
A Paid Media: The One Source of Truth
As was disclosed in the NZ Royal Commission report, the NZ Labour government borrowed $ 60 billion during the pandemic. That actual amount is well over $ 100 billion.
The Labour Party-led government borrowed more money in one month than John Key's government borrowed in two years.
So, who did that money go to and WHY?
One major beneficiary of government spending was the NZ MEDIA organisations. They received in excess of $50 Million directly. BUT, the real amount from 2020-2022 was well over $250 Million.
More than 370 NGOs (non-governmental organizations) were funded with over $8 BILLION per year to drive SOCIAL CHANGES without your consent. This was then further supported by the media.
The funding came with a caveat: SUPPORT THE GOVERNMENT OR ELSE.
In March 2020. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern instructed citizens to rely solely on official government information, stating, "We will continue to be your single source of truth".
The News Media parroted everything that spouted from the government font.
Any investigation, article, or statement that was contrary to the ‘official story’ was met with derision and full attacks by the media as “right-wing conspiracy”.
Independent journalists were de-platformed from Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram.
This isn’t the NEWS. It is PAID STATE-RUN PROPAGANDA!
--
Be Kind, While We Take Your Rights: PR Companies Running the Govt
In New Zealand, 2020 was also an Election Year.
Here is the problem:
Jacinda, the Prime Minister, was on TV every day during the COVID-19 pandemic, providing updates on the virus. That is more airtime than any previous Prime Minister in New Zealand’s history.
On March 20, 2020, Clemenger BBDO (a media and ad agency hired by the NZ government) released the “Be Kind” COVID-19 Poster, which featured the Prime Minister in a format that copied the original Obama presidential poster in 2008, with huge words at the bottom: BE KIND.
From March to July, the posters were plastered on bus stops, buses, billboards, and walls, all over New Zealand. The NZ Media (who were now paid very well) further fawned over the posters and the “fearless leader”. Originally, the media said that they did not know who was putting up the posters and that it must be because New Zealanders LOVED what Jacinda was doing. That was a lie.
Here is the problem with that:
Jacinda was the Prime Minister. She was also the leader of the NZ Labour Party, which was now in an Election contest. The hundreds of thousands of “Be kind” posters did not bear any campaign disclosure. This was ELECTION MATERIAL and is contrary to Election law.
The New Zealand Electoral Commission refused to identify the posters as "electioneering" fraud and allowed them to stay. They said it was "art," not advertising.
Our taxes paid BBDO and other Ad Agencies hundreds of millions of dollars to produce materials during the pandemic. Ads played continuously on social media. Printed flyers and cards were put into every mailbox — all with the distinctive bright yellow with thick black WARNING lettering. “Be afraid” was the messaging 24/7.
This was more PAID PROPAGANDA. Since there are no real checks or balances in the New Zealand Constitution or law, this one-sided bombardment of socialist filth continued to no end.
--
When is a Mortgage Holiday Not a Holiday?
On 24th March 2020, the New Zealand Parliament passed a motion granting Kiwis a 6-month mortgage holiday due to the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide closures.
How nice.
The country went wild with appreciation. The Prime Minister, in full elation (seeing that this is an election year).
But what REALLY is this Mortgage HOLIDAY all about?
Let's talk to the Bank of New Zealand (BNZ) and find out...
Homeowner: My mortgage payments are $495 per week.
So for the next 6 months, I don't have to pay for this, and it is a free holiday?
BNZ: No, no, no, no, no. Not free. If you take advantage of this mortgage holiday, we will still be charging you INTEREST for those 6 months.
Homeowner: So what is that going to cost me?
BNZ: At your interest rate of 3% on your mortgage balance of $300,000, that will add an additional $4,500 to your home mortgage and add 6 months to your mortgage term.
Homeowner: How about your "interest-only" payment plan?
BNZ: You would have to pay $750 per month for 6 months, and it will also add $7,380 to your mortgage balance, which you will have to pay at the end of your term, or we can finance that for you.
--
This is definitely not a Mortgage Holiday.
Really Big Numbers
According to the Ministry of Statistics, the total amount of home mortgages held by banks for New Zealand properties is about $275 Billion (as of November 2019).
So, let's do some math…
Let's use a basic interest rate of 3% for this example.
3% of $275 Billion is $8,250,000,000 (or $8.25 Billion).
That is for 1-year of interest.
So 6-months of that would be $4.125 Billion.
In doing this wonderful, awe-inspiring, selfless act to help preserve the Kiwi way of life... the banks are earning an ADDITIONAL $4.125 Billion in interest.
I bet that didn't take too much convincing.
The words 'MORTGAGE HOLIDAY' are actually an existing bank product.
It seems that Parliament has 'sold us' a bill of goods, making it look like they actually did something when in fact they have done nothing at all.
How deceptive.
--
The WAGE SUBSIDY: How to Kill Small Businesses
April 1, 2020. And tens of thousands of businesses are preparing tomorrow’s wages for many hundreds of thousands of employees.
Many of them applied to Work and Income and were granted MSD’s COVID-19 Wage Subsidy. And they’re now about to realise two home truths about this monumental relief package…
IRD is still taking out PAYE from wages
KiwiSaver must still be paid in full
Say what?! Yes, WHAT indeed.
So suddenly, that $585.80 (for full-time employees) just got a whole lot less. And the employer's savings account just got drained further.
In the Parliamentary Press Release of 17 March 2020, the Hon Grant Robertson outlined the government's $12.1 billion support for New Zealanders and businesses.
You can read it here:
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/121-billion-support-new-zealanders-and-business
See any mention of PAYE in there?
It’s not mentioned anywhere except on the Work and Income website:
PAYE
Your employee will need to pay tax on their wage subsidy payment as it’s paid to them as part of their normal wages. This means it's subject to the usual employer deductions, eg, PAYE, Student Loan, KiwiSaver, Child Support, etc.
When calculating PAYE deductions, do not gross up the Wage Subsidy component. PAYE is deducted from the subsidy (i.e., $585.50 less PAYE, etc).
From first glance, that looks OK. Until you read the guidelines VERY CAREFULLY:
If you are receiving the COVID-19 Wage Subsidy, you must try your hardest to pay the employee named in your application at least 80% of their usual wages. If that isn’t possible, you need to pay at least the subsidy rate (ie, full-time or part-time).
Let’s run some numbers with our friend XERO.
Our employee is paid $20/hour: $800 weekly + commission. They usually take home between $750-$970 net per week.
Our employee has agreed to take home $600/week during the shutdown period. Any less and it would be hard for them to make payments and eat too.
$585.80 from MSD
$ 81.80 PAYE
$ 17.57 KiwiSaver deductions
$ 17.57 Superannuation (contribution from employer)
The employee takes home: $486.43
The employer cost is: $17.57
That is less than half of their usual pay, and nowhere near the 80% asked for. So, we, the employer, make up the difference:
$150.00 from the employer's savings account
$585.80 from MSD
$ 110.14 PAYE
$ 22.07 KiwiSaver deductions
$ 22.07 Superannuation (contribution from employer)
The employee now takes home: $603.59
The employer cost is: $172.07
We’re lucky. We’ve only had one employee. But I’ve got restaurateur clients with 6 full-time employees and 2 part-timers.
For them, this out-of-pocket adjustment will cost them well over $1,100 per week -- with no other income.
Add to that several hundred a week for equipment leases, and another hundred a week for their delivery van. Toss in the usual for insurance payments...and don't even mention the RENT on a completely vacant place.
Parliament's COVID-19 Wage Subsidy solution for businesses feeds IRD directly from the savings of small and large businesses in the guise of helping them.
It was never a solution.
--
Suicides: What Was Reported vs What Was Happening
I interviewed a Wellington cop after Wellington was allowed to go down to Level 2.
The suicide rate in the large cities was 5 times the normal rate. They spoke to me about this because they were distraught, as they were not allowed to discuss it.
Shortly after that, the MoH and the Minister for Mental Health went on the news to say that the suicide statistics were actually lower than normal. The televised statement from the Minister for Mental Health was an outright lie, and all those who worked in the Mental health field KNEW IT.
In the East Coast area of the North Island, when bodies were discovered, sometimes weeks after the person died, they were NOT listed as a suicide, but as a COVID-19 death.
In the South Island, the highest level of suicides was by farmers. These were also misreported as COVID deaths.
Around that time, Statistics New Zealand REMOVED the SUICIDE stats page from its website, citing a website redesign.
Nothing to see here, citizen, move along, move along.
--
Mental Health Law Changes: Forced Mental Sectioning and Institutionalisation
When the lockdowns began in New Zealand, police were sent to ' round up’ known mental patients, indigents, and homeless people.
Under the Mental Health Act, the following persons are allowed to make an application for a section:
- A family member or spouse.
- A medical professional, such as a GP or nurse.
- A member of a local mental health crisis team.
It then needs to be confirmed by a medical doctor, preferably a psychiatrist.
But, during the pandemic, the rules were changed:
- A policeman could now make the application with the confirmation by a nurse (NOT A DOCTOR).
Many of these people who were rounded up wound up in mental institutions without any reason other than being a ‘known’ mental patient or homeless.
From an interview with a person who had been arrested:
They were thrown into an institution because they could NOT give an address where they were living. People living in their cars, campers, or vans were targeted.
One case I worked on involved a 30-year-old mental patient who was living by herself in her own apartment and was quite able to care for herself.
The lockdowns started, and police came, taking her to a mental institution where she was sectioned and heavily drugged. Her parents were NOT notified. The contents of her apartment were discarded. It took months before her father found her.
At the family's request, I attended a meeting with the institution's administration and staff regarding the patient in August of 2020. At that time, the girl had been in the institution since March. She was also heavily sedated, not being able to communicate. At my insistence, the Administrator agreed to start weaning her off the heavy meds so that her parents could visit with her.
Note:
The Administrator could not give a clear indication of WHY the police were required to arrest her and mentally section her, as she had not done anything to warrant it.
Fast forward to 2026:
- The girl is STILL in the institution and is still drugged. That is SIX YEARS.
- The parents have NO RIGHTS or say.
- The girl is also an American citizen, which opens up all kinds of questions.
Fun Fact:
In New Zealand, mental facilities, like the one the girl is in, get paid by BODIES in BEDS. For a “long-term” inmate, the facility gets $1million PER INMATE per year, paid for by YOUR TAXES. Thus, it is very profitable to keep people drugged and locked up.
This is not CARE or HEALTH.
THIS NEEDS TO CHANGE.
--
“There was no compulsory vaccination!”: But Actions Said Otherwise
In September 2023, Chris Hipkins, the leader of NZLabour, said, "There was no compulsory vaccination, people made their own choices."
That is not true.
If you were in these industries listed below, you either got vaxxed or you lost your job.
New Zealand implemented COVID-19 vaccine mandates primarily through the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order 2021 (and its amendments), which required certain workers to be vaccinated to continue in their roles.
The government also forced ASSOCIATIONS to require the vax for their licensees (such as the Association for Registered Beauty Professionals).
Here are the industries that were REQUIRED by MANDATE to be vaccinated:
- Border and aviation/maritime/port workers (including MIQ facilities, airport/port staff, those boarding ships, pilots, stevedores, and related high-risk border roles) — earliest mandates from April/May 2021, expanded July 2021.
- Health and disability sector workers (including hospitals, aged care, community care, primary health, those with patient contact, and support roles like administration in relevant settings) — expanded October 2021.
- Education sector workers (teachers, early childhood educators, school and tertiary staff in roles interacting with students) — expanded October 2021.
- Corrections/prison staff (Department of Corrections workers in prisons) — expanded October 2021.
- Police (New Zealand Police officers and recruits) — expanded late 2021.
- Defence Force (New Zealand Defence Force personnel) — expanded late 202.
- Fire and Emergency Services (frontline Fire and Emergency New Zealand staff) — expanded late 2021.
- A separate policy announcement in late October 2021 extended mandates to workers in close-contact/hospitality businesses (e.g., restaurants, bars, gyms, hairdressers/barbers, and certain personal services), requiring vaccination or risking job loss — this affected parts of the hospitality, fitness, and personal care sectors, though businesses could sometimes opt for alternative operations.
These mandates were government-imposed via orders, distinct from private employer policies or the separate vaccine pass system (under the COVID-19 Protection Framework from December 2021 to April 2022), which required proof of vaccination for entry to many public venues/hospitality but did not directly mandate worker vaccination across entire industries.
You could not enter a restaurant, government office, or hospital without proof of vaccination.
On October 25, 2021, during an interview/press conference, New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern was discussing the government's planned shift to the COVID-19 Protection Framework.
A reporter from the New Zealand Herald (NZ Herald) asked her directly (paraphrased in reports):
"You've basically said, and you probably don't see it like this, but two different classes of people. If you're vaccinated, you have all these rights?"
Ardern responded affirmatively, nodding and saying: "That is what it is. Yup.”
This exchange was widely reported and clipped as her acknowledging (or accepting) that the policy would create a form of "two-tier society" between vaccinated and unvaccinated people.
She framed it as a deliberate incentive to boost vaccination rates and protect public health, noting that unvaccinated individuals would "miss out on" certain everyday things.
It was TOTAL COMPLIANCE, or YOU WERE FINISHED.
I lost over 50 clients because of the lockdowns in New Zealand.
Most mom-and-pop businesses I had closed or went bankrupt.
--
Mongrel Mob/Black Power: Paid Assassins for NZLabour
During the pandemic years of 2020-2023, the Mongrel Mob, New Zealand’s most notorious and damaging criminal gang, received over $3.5 million from the New Zealand government. This is well-documented.
This, however, is not, because the money here was paid in CASH:
The Mongrel Mob gang was paid $5,000 for every 20 kids/teenagers/adults that they coerced to get a COVID-19 vaccination. The gangs also offered a new iPhone to young people to act as people wranglers and bring them in for vaccinations.
In August of 2020, a prominent Black Power member who had attended a Black Power BBQ said that Jacinda was there and had offered the leader $1.5 Million. This money came from NGOs and other sources. Nothing to lead back to the Labour government directly.
Why?
The gangs became the muscle for NZ Labour. To do the bidding of Jacinda and the NGOs.
To intimidate, bully, and worse, anybody (such as myself) who was investigating the misdeeds of the government during COVID.
BLM : "No quarantine needed!" - Wow, just like COVID didn't exist...Major Black Lives Matter solidarity protests and marches took place across New Zealand, including Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch, and Dunedin, on June 1, 2020, even though New Zealand was still in lockdown, and there is no causal connection to the movement in New Zealand. People marched without any masks or social distancing, and, surprise, nobody got sick. Mongrel Mob members who wore their leather jackets and were very prominent in the marches publicly stated that “they were being paid to be there”.
Māori-led checkpoints, often referred to as iwi checkpoints or roadblocks, were established in Northland (Te Tai Tokerau) at several key points during the COVID-19 pandemic to protect local communities, particularly in 2020 and 2021. That is what the NZ Media told people.
However, those checkpoints were manned by members of the Mongrel Mob and other gangs.
In June of 2021, Jacinda closed New Zealand's airspace. No flights in or out.
Except that was not true.
Flights continued weekly, coming from China and the Middle East. Vanloads of immigrants continued to be shuffled up the North Island through those Iwi checkpoints. Somehow, the great immigrant replacement (UN Agenda 2030) never stopped during the pandemic. It just went under the radar.
Also, people like Bill Gates flew into New Zealand during the total shutdown and did not have to go into any quarantine. Likewise, film companies continued to fly people and staff in and out without any visits to MIQ or quarantine.
Socialism: One set of rules for me, another set for thee.
--
Forced Vaccinations in Low-Decile (the Poorest) Areas
In late April 2020, a lady contacted me from Otara in Auckland, which is a low-decile area. Her son, who was in year 6 (about 10 years old), told her that a District Nurse had visited the school and every child was vaccinated (without parental approval or notification). The kid was smart enough to run out of the school and go back home.
Further investigation showed that this was also happening in other low-decile areas of Hastings, where the District nurses were going door to door with the police as escorts.
In late March 2020, I was contacted by a construction worker who had been following my posts on COVID. He and others were working around the clock at the Otara Shopping Centre in Ōtara, Auckland. This is a financially depressed and a mostly Maori and Pacific Islander population. They were building a PERMANENT COVID-19 TESTING CENTER.
July 17, 2020: How Come Nobody Is Wearing Masks?
We all had to! Total hypocrisy!I confirmed the information, and on 4 April, New Zealand news announced the opening of the COVID-19 testing station in Otara, with Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern cutting the ribbon.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/413452/covid-19-testing-station-opens-in-otara
South Seas Healthcare was awarded contracts totaling $39.7 million by Health New Zealand (Te Whatu Ora) between July 2019 and March 2023.
During the pandemic response, South Seas was part of larger funding packages, including:
- an $18 million direct boost for Pacific providers as part of a wider $140 million Omicron support package in 2022.
- $140 million to test people using the PCR test, which CANNOT differentiate between COVID, H1N1, flu, or a myriad of other bacteria and viruses.
South Seas Healthcare conducted 100,000 tests and was also a mass vaccination center.
Why the Pacific Island population? They are the most gullible, as tribal leaders could easily sway people into getting tested and vaccinated.
Meetings I had with Tribal Chiefs of the Cook Islands in 2024 revealed that a great number of their older people and chiefs had died after the MANDATED vaccinations. It is a pivotal reason why the Cook Islands have been moving away from New Zealand and embracing China. They no longer trust the New Zealand Government.
The birthrate in the Polynesian region, including the Cook Islands, is down 13% post-COVID. The largest single-year or short-period absolute/percentage drops in recent data cluster in 2021.
That is not a coincidence.
--
New Zealand and Statistics
So, how many businesses closed as a result of the pandemic?
Can’t tell you, there is no one source of information.
How many house foreclosures?
Can’t tell you, there is no one source of information.
How many bankruptcies?
Can’t tell you, there is no one source of information.
When is a lack of statistical information a symptom of abject FRAUD, COVER-UP, and INCOMPETENCE?
How the hell can you run a country without accurate financial and statistical information?
In 2011, I was most famously asked to “not come back again” when, during a public meeting, I confronted the CEO of Transparency International New Zealand about the legitimacy of the data supplied by the New Zealand government’s Open Government initiative.
I pointed out multiple instances of direct manipulation of financial and statistical data by government departments and ministries (like the Police, NIWA, DoC...).
The CEO’s answer was: “The New Zealand government would NEVER LIE about information!”
Yeah, right.
New Zealand has regularly topped or been near the top of Transparency International’s Top 10 Least Corrupt Countries list.
The joke here is that New Zealand’s corruption is SO DEEPLY INGRAINED into the societal framework that it appears as a normal operating process. Anybody's cursory viewing of New Zealand from the outside would never be able to tell. But spend some time here, and watch out…nothing is as it appears.
--
In Closing:
Let's be clear. There was NOTHING that happened during COVID-19 that should have been made a STATE SECRET. We were all in this together. FULL TRANSPARENCY SHOULD have been the correct operation mode.
We also need to have a larger discussion on SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM and how easily New Zealand has been taken over by this ideology so thoroughly by NZ Labour and the NZ Greens.
The NZ Labour government, the Supreme Court, and the Governor-General need to be PROSECUTED, JAILED, and, hopefully, worse, for what they did to New Zealanders during that time. This was HIGH TREASON.
@jacindaardern and @chrishipkins, this is ENTIRELY ON YOUR HEADS.
WE WON'T FORGET, and WE WON'T FORGIVE!
X Article: https://x.com/TheShadow_info/status/2033324191752085636?s=20
-----
Suggested Further Reading About New Zealand's Handling of COVID:
Seems Nobody Has Learned from History...Again
New Zealand COVID Vaccine and Deaths:
https://www.theshadow.info/articles/seems-nobody-has-learned-from-history-again
Is it About Health or the Profits and Politics?
https://www.theshadow.info/articles/is-it-about-health-or-the-profits-and-politics
The $60 Million NZ COVID Contact Tracing App
Did 'Friends of the Govt' Scam us all? Where did the Money go?
https://www.theshadow.info/articles/the-60-million-nz-covid-contact-tracing-app